As the global solar industry continues to evolve, high-efficiency N-type cell technologies have become the new mainstream. Among them, TOPCon, HJT, and HPBC are the three most discussed and rapidly deployed solutions.
While all three aim to deliver higher efficiency and lower LCOE, their structures, performance characteristics, and ideal applications are very different. This article explains the key differences and helps you choose the right technology for your solar project.
TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) is currently the most widely adopted N-type cell technology in mass production.
Ultra-thin tunnel oxide layer combined with doped polysilicon contacts
Upgraded from traditional PERC production lines
High efficiency with good cost control
Strong bifacial performance
Mature and stable mass production
Competitive cost per watt
Bifacial factor up to 80–85%
Well suited for large-scale deployment
Utility-scale solar power plants
Commercial & industrial (C&I) rooftop projects
Cost-sensitive markets seeking high ROI
HJT (Heterojunction Technology) combines crystalline silicon and amorphous silicon layers, offering some of the best electrical performance in the industry.
Excellent surface passivation
Low-temperature manufacturing process
Very high bifaciality
Industry-leading temperature coefficient
High energy yield in hot climates
Outstanding low-light performance
Bifacial factor above 90%
Lower power loss at high temperatures
Higher manufacturing cost
Expensive equipment and materials
More complex supply chain
High-temperature regions (Middle East, Africa)
Projects with high albedo (snow, sand, reflective ground)
Premium solar power plants prioritizing maximum output
HPBC (Hybrid Passivated Back Contact) is an advanced back-contact cell technology that places all electrical contacts on the rear side of the cell.
No front-side metal grid lines
Maximum light absorption on the front surface
Clean, all-black appearance
High conversion efficiency
Superior aesthetics
Higher theoretical efficiency due to zero front shading
Ideal for visible rooftop installations
Complex manufacturing process
Lower bifaciality compared to TOPCon and HJT
Higher cost
High-end residential rooftops
Premium distributed generation projects
Markets where aesthetics and brand value matter
| Item | TOPCon | HJT | HPBC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell Type | N-type TOPCon | N-type Heterojunction | N-type Back Contact |
| Front Grid Lines | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mass Production Efficiency | 25–25.5% | 25–26% | 25.5–26% |
| Bifacial Factor | 80–85% | 90%+ | ~70% |
| Temperature Coefficient | Good | Excellent | Good |
| Manufacturing Cost | Lowest | Highest | High |
| Visual Appearance | Standard | Standard | Premium Black |
Choosing the right solar technology depends on project scale, climate conditions, and investment priorities.
Choose TOPCon if you are looking for the best balance between cost and performance, especially for large-scale or C&I projects.
Choose HJT if your project is located in hot or high-reflection environments and maximum energy yield is critical.
Choose HPBC if aesthetics, premium branding, and rooftop visibility are key decision factors.
There is no single “best” solar cell technology for all projects. TOPCon, HJT, and HPBC each represent different optimization paths within N-type solar technology.
Understanding their strengths and limitations allows developers, EPCs, and investors to maximize project value and long-term returns.
If you need professional advice on technology selection or customized solar solutions, feel free to contact our team.
EN 
ES 
FR 
DE 
RU 
ZH 
AR 
RO 
BG 
